Monday, February 6, 2012

Idaho: Changes for state execution policy and procedures

0 comments
Idaho Execution Chamber
BOISE, Idaho - Right after Paul Rhoades became the first person executed in Idaho in more than 50 years, department of correction administrators reviewed the execution and felt some changes needed to be made prior to any future executions.

IDOC director Brent Reinke said his department has sense made changes in the standard operation procedure.

"This needs to be flawless and we need to do the right job for our state. It's a significant undertaking and it's something that we wanted to make sure as we debrief and find areas where we can improve the process," Reinke said.

Under the improved operating procedure, the warden will no longer be solely in charge of every aspect of the execution.

"There's just too many areas around the facility for that individual to take care of in this kind of setting so we have an administrative team that can be spread out a little more," Reinke said.

The administrative team will handle most of the logistics surrounding the execution while the warden continues to focus on the day-to-day operations.

Members of the media are usually selected as witnesses of the execution but in the past, the selection occurred on the day of the event. Under the new policy, members of the media will be selected seven day in advance.

"That will give us some time to work with those media witnesses prior to them representing the public in that event," Reinke said.

The new policy also allows additional witnesses related to the case to view the execution.

When Paul Rhoades was put to death, executioners used a three-drug protocol to do the job but for future cases, executioners will have the option to use a single lethal dose of drugs.

"We want to have in our standard operating procedure the flexibility to either use the three as we did and that would be our intentions, but if there were some reason that we would want to use the one drug protocol that is a part of the three, then we would have the flexibility to be able to do that," Reinke said.

During past executions, the team responsible for administering the lethal injection was labeled the injection team but Reinke said their title has changed to medical team.

There are other ideas Reinke would like to put in place regarding execution procedures and policies but KBOI was told those specific recommendations would require approval from state law makers.

Source: KBOI2.com, Feb. 5, 2012

Related video here

UAE: Murderers spared the death sentence

0 comments
Dubai: Two murderers were spared execution yesterday when a court commuted their death sentence to 15 years in jail for premeditatedly murdering a man and burning his body.

The Dubai Appeal Court overturned the initial death sentence and jailed the Indian defendants, a 37-year-old driver and a 27-year-old supervisor, for committing a premeditated murder associated with another crime.

"The court has dismissed the public prosecution's appeal and accepted that of the defendants.

"The two accused obtained a written waiver from the blood parents. They handed a copy to the court. Mainly that was why the panel of judges treated the defendants with leniency and reduced the capital punishment to a 15-year imprisonment," Presiding Judge Al Sharif told Gulf News yesterday.


Source: GulfNews.com, Feb. 6, 2012

India Supreme Court: Mandatory death penalty is unconstitutional

0 comments
The Supreme Court has ruled that mandatory death penalty for an offender under the Arms Act was unconstitutional as it violated fundamental rights guaranteed to a citizen.

A Bench of Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly (since retd) and J S Khehar said Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, which imposed mandatory death penalty, was also "ultra vires and void" as it restricts the powers of the court in awarding sentences to an accused in such cases.

"A law which is not consistent with notions of fairness while it imposes an irreversible penalty like death penalty is repugnant to the concept of right and reason," the Bench said.

"All these concepts of 'due process' and the concept of a just, fair and reasonable law has been read by this court into the guarantee under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

"Therefore, the provision of Section 27(3) of the Act is violative of Article 14 (equality before law) and 21 (liberty) of the Constitution," Justice Ganguly, writing the judgement, said.

The apex court passed the appeal while dismissing a Punjab government appeal challenging the acquittal of Dalbir Singh, a CRPF constable charged with indiscriminately firing at his superiors with a rifle over a service row in 1993.

He was charged with murder (Section 302IPC) and various offences under the Arms Act.

Section 27(3) mandates that "whoever uses any prohibited arms or prohibited ammunition or acts in contravention of Section 7 and if such use or act results in the death of any other person then that person guilty of such use or acting in contravention of Section 7 shall be punishable with death."

Source: Indian Express, Feb. 5, 2012


India Supreme Court: No mandatory death penalty for killing with illegal arms

February 1, 2012: In India, the Supreme Court held that Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, 1959 that provides for "mandatory death penalty" in case of death being caused by use of prohibited arms is ultra vires (beyond the powers) of the constitution and declared it void.

The provision of death sentence was inserted in Section 27 of the Arms Act by amending it in 1988 in the wake of terrorist and anti-national activities in Punjab.

The apex court bench of Justice A.K. Ganguly and Justice J.S. Khehar in their judgment said that "this is thus a very drastic provision" as it provides for "mandatory death penalty."

The sub-section (3) of the Section 27 of the act which deals with the punishment for using arms, says "whoever uses any prohibited arms or prohibited ammunition or does any act in contravention of section 7 and such use or act results in the death of any other person, shall be punishable with death penalty".

The Section 7 of the act prohibits acquisition or possession, or manufacture or sale of prohibited arms or prohibited ammunitions.

The provision of death sentence was inserted in the Section 27 of act in 1988. Prior to the amendment, the maximum sentence under this section was seven years or fine or both.

Referring to the constitution's 44th amendment, the judgment said: "That is why it has been provided by the 44th amendment act of 1978 of the constitution, that Article 21 (protection of life and personal liberty) cannot be suspended even during the proclamation of emergency under Article 359."


Sources: IANS, newkerala.com, Feb. 1, 2012

Sunday, February 5, 2012

Florida: Three decades on death row, execution set

0 comments
A 65-year-old man is scheduled to be executed in the US state of Florida on 15 February for a murder committed in January 1980. He has been on death row for half of his life.

In September 1980, 33-year-old Robert Waterhouse was sentenced to death for the first-degree murder of Deborah Kammerer. Her nude body had been found eight months earlier in mud flats at Tampa Bay, Florida. Robert Waterhouse, who at the time of the crime was on parole in relation to a second-degree murder conviction in 1966 in New York, was arrested and charged with the Kammerer murder. In 1988, the Florida Supreme Court ordered a new sentencing hearing (see overleaf). He was re-sentenced to death in 1990.

In 2003, Robert Waterhouse's lawyers filed a motion in state court for DNA testing of evidence from the crime. At a hearing in 2005, it was established that the evidence had been destroyed and that there was nothing left that could be subjected to DNA analysis. The judge concluded that the destruction had been inadvertent. A new defense motion argues that it would be unconstitutional to execute a prisoner who has "consistently and continuously maintained his innocence", who in support of this claim has sought DNA testing unavailable at the time of his trial, and where all relevant evidence has been destroyed as a result of official recklessness or negligence. The Florida Supreme Court is due to hear oral arguments on the motion on 7 February.

The motion also provides new evidence from a man who says that on the night of the murder he was in the bar from which, according to the trial testimony of a bartender who was a key witness for the prosecution, Robert Waterhouse had left with Deborah Kammerer. In a sworn statement signed on 9 January 2012, the new witness (who also worked at the bar) claimed that it would have been impossible for the bartender to have seen the exit from where she said she was at the time. The new witness said that on the night in question he had seen Robert Waterhouse leave the bar with two white males, not with the victim. He further alleges that he was interviewed by police at the time, and that he had told them this, but that the detective had seemed "disinterested" and subsequently "accused [me] of trying to protect a murderer." The new witness says that he has come forward now because he read a newspaper article on 5 January 2012 which stated that Robert Waterhouse had been seen leaving the bar with Deborah Kammerer, which the witness states was "not true."

Robert Waterhouse's lawyers have pointed to the commutation in 2005, by the Governor of Virginia, of the death sentence of Robin Lovitt. The governor pointed to the destruction by officials of biological and other evidence from the crime. Noting that the death penalty was the state's "most severe and final sanction," he said the system "must operate with complete integrity" and that the evidence destruction had "breached the public trust in the system."

Please write immediately in your own language:

- Explaining that you are not seeking to downplay the seriousness of the crime, or the suffering caused;

- Expressing concern that evidence from the crime has been destroyed, making DNA testing impossible;

- Noting the new witness evidence calling into question the trial testimony of a key prosecution witness;

- Urging the Governor to commute Robert Waterhouse's death sentence.

PLEASE SEND APPEALS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, AND BEFORE 15 FEBRUARY 2012:

Governor Rick Scott
Office of the Governor,
The Capitol,
400 S. Monroe St
Tallahassee, FL
32399-0001
USA
Salutation: Dear Governor

Please check with the AIUSA Urgent Action Office if sending appeals after the above date.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

In 1988, the Florida Supreme Court ordered a new sentencing for Robert Waterhouse consistent with a 1987 US Supreme Court decision relating to mitigation evidence in capital cases. At the re-sentencing hearing in 1990, Robert Waterhouse refused to allow the presentation of any mitigation evidence on his behalf. He said that his lawyer could have presented "at least half a dozen factors in mitigation" but that he would not allow him to do so because "I shouldn't be up here begging for my life," and not presenting such evidence "spares my family the embarrassment, the trauma". He had wanted his lawyer to make a "lingering doubt" argument, but as this was not considered a mitigating factor under Florida law, the lawyer considered that he could not ethically do so.

The two lawyers who represented Robert Waterhouse at his original 1980 trial have seen the statement signed in January 2012 by the man who has come forward to question the trial evidence. These lawyers have themselves now signed statements asserting that he would have been in important witness for them to present at the trial in order to undermine the prosecution's key witness, the bartender who had said Robert Waterhouse had left the bar with Deborah Kammerer. They state that although there is a "brief mention" of this witness in the police report which they had seen prior to the trial, the report indicated that he had "had no information about the evening in question." The lawyers assert that they did not contact this witness because they had "relied on this police report as being an accurate and truthful statement of what [the witness] told the police."

The death penalty in the USA is marked by arbitrariness, discrimination and error. One of the starkest statistics about the death penalty is that since the US Supreme Court ruled in 1976 that executions could resume under new capital statutes, more than 130 people have been released from death rows on the grounds of innocence. In more than 10 per cent of these innocence cases, DNA evidence played a substantial role in the exoneration.

Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases, regardless of questions of guilt or innocence, the facts of the crime, or the method of execution. Today, some 140 countries are abolitionist in law or practice. The USA appears to be turning against the death penalty. There were 43 executions in the USA in 2011, compared to 46 in 2010 and 52 in 2009. A more marked decline can be seen in the annual death sentencing total which has fallen by about two-thirds since the mid-1990s. In 2011, the number of death sentences passed during the year fell below 100 for the first time since executions resumed in 1977.

There have been 1279 executions in the USA since judicial killing resumed there in 1977, including 71 in Florida. There have been two executions in the USA so far in 2012, carried out in Oklahoma and Texas.

Name(s): Robert Waterhouse (m)

Issue(s): Death penalty

---------------------------------

** POSTAGE RATES **

Within the United States:
$0.32 - Postcards
$0.45 - Letters and Cards (up to 1 oz.)
To Canada:
$0.85 - Postcards
$0.85 - Airmail Letters and Cards (up to 1 oz.)
To Mexico:
$0.85 - Postcards
$0.85 - Airmail Letters and Cards (up to 1 oz.)
To all other destination countries:
$1.05 - Postcards
$1.05 - Airmail Letters and Cards (up to 1 oz.)

Amnesty International is a worldwide grassroots movement that promotes and defends human rights.

This Urgent Action may be reposted if kept intact, including contact information and stop action date (if applicable). Thank you for your help with this appeal.

Urgent Action Network
Amnesty International USA
600 Pennsylvania Ave SE 5th fl
Washington DC 20003
Phone: 202.509.8193
Fax: 202.675.8566

Mitt Romney's position on Capital Punishment

0 comments
“From my perspective, there are two main camps when it comes to the death penalty. On one side, there are some people who believe there are certain crimes that are so offensive… so reprehensible…. so far beyond the bounds of civilized society that they demand the ultimate punishment. In the other camp are well-meaning people who believe that it is immoral for government to ever take a life. In the middle, I believe, are others who could support the death penalty if it is narrowly applied and contains the appropriate safeguards. It is with that group in mind that we have brought forward the death penalty bill before you today…
The appropriate response of society to terrorism carried out around the world or within the Commonwealth’s borders is to apply the death penalty. That is why the legislation I filed in April accounts for terrorism, along with a small number of other crimes, including the assassination of a law enforcement officer, judge, juror or prosecutor, for the purpose of obstructing an ongoing criminal proceeding. My legislation would also allow juries to consider the death penalty in cases that involve prolonged torture or multiple murders, as well as cases in which the defendant has already been convicted of first-degree murder or is serving a life sentence without parole.”

July 14, 2005, Death Penalty Testimony of Governor Mitt Romney to the Massachusetts House of Representatives, in support of his April 28, 2005 filing of a death penalty bill that was ultimately rejected by the legislature.

Source: 2012 Republican Candidates, February 2012

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Saudi beheads man convicted of murder

0 comments
RIYADH: Saudi Arabia on Thursday executed a man convicted of murder in the Kingdom's southwest, the Interior Ministry said.

Abulrahman Al-Qarni shot dead fellow Saudi Mushabab Al-Khathami during a dispute, said the ministry statement carried by Saudi Press Agency (SPA).

The man was beheaded in the town of Al-Baha in southwestern Saudi Arabia, SPA reported.

The execution brings to six the number of death sentences carried out in the Kingdom so far in 2012, according to an AFP tally based on official reports.

The Kingdom applies the death penalty for a wide range of offenses, including rape, murder, armed robbery and drug trafficking.

Sources: Arab News, Agence France-Presse, Feb. 3, 2012

Friday, February 3, 2012

Iraq court agrees execution of Baghdad church attackers

0 comments
BAGHDAD: Iraq’s highest court ratified death sentences on Thursday for three men convicted of a 2010 attack on a Syrian Catholic cathedral in Baghdad, the bloodiest attack on Iraqi Christians after the 2003 invasion.

Gunmen linked to Al-Qaeda seized hostages during Sunday mass at the Our Lady of Salvation church in Baghdad on Oct. 31, 2010. Around 52 hostages and police were killed and 67 wounded in the attack, which ended when security forces stormed the church.

Al Qaeda’s Iraqi affiliate, Islamic State of Iraq, claimed responsibility for the attack.

“There are three convicted criminals. All of them are Iraqis and they were convicted based on the terrorism law,” said Abdul-Sattar Al-Birqdar, spokesman for the Supreme Judicial Council.

“The sentence is final and it will be sent to the presidency to issue a decree to the Justice Ministry to execute it.” Last week, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay criticized Iraq for carrying out a large number of executions and questioned the fairness of its judicial proceedings. On Wednesday, Iraq executed 17 people.

While most of the sectarian fighting that followed the 2003 US-led invasion was between Sunni and Shiite Muslims, attacks on Christians in Iraq have increased in recent years.

The brazen assault on Our Lady of Salvation struck fear into the Christian community, prompting hundreds of families to flee to Iraq’s northern Kurdish region or overseas. Pope Benedict condemned the attack.

Iraq once had about 1.5 million Christians but the number has fallen sharply in recent years, according to church reports. Iraq’s total population is estimated at about 30 million.

One of the alleged leaders of the church attack, Huthaifa Al-Batawi, known as Al-Qaeda’s “Emir of Baghdad,” was killed in an attempted jailbreak last May, officials said.

Sources: Arab News, Reuters, Feb. 2, 2012